<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin and SNL&#8217;s cowardice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://korrvalues.com/2008/10/11/sarah-palin-and-snls-cowardice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://korrvalues.com/2008/10/11/sarah-palin-and-snls-cowardice/</link>
	<description>"Other things deserve blogs too"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:37:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starlight</title>
		<link>http://korrvalues.com/2008/10/11/sarah-palin-and-snls-cowardice/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Starlight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://korrvalues.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree with your post and have a similar post on my blog.  By featuring Palin on their show, SNL has given her the perfect platform to connect with people and appears to be trying to ingratiate her to their fans, totally invalidating all of their previous commentary on her.  I guess that&#039;s fine if they don&#039;t want people to think they&#039;re trying to make a statement on anything, but are only there to do caricatures and make fart jokes.  It&#039;s a shame, though that they would waste the talent and wit of smart people like Tina Fey who could have an actual impact on people&#039;s views.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your post and have a similar post on my blog.  By featuring Palin on their show, SNL has given her the perfect platform to connect with people and appears to be trying to ingratiate her to their fans, totally invalidating all of their previous commentary on her.  I guess that&#8217;s fine if they don&#8217;t want people to think they&#8217;re trying to make a statement on anything, but are only there to do caricatures and make fart jokes.  It&#8217;s a shame, though that they would waste the talent and wit of smart people like Tina Fey who could have an actual impact on people&#8217;s views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://korrvalues.com/2008/10/11/sarah-palin-and-snls-cowardice/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://korrvalues.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it does take a lot to make sure the trees all stand in a straight line.  And the grizzly bears need some sort of representation.

I think the point here has been lost on some audience members blinded by all this talk of partisanship.  The real issue is SNL&#039;s ability to provide timely commentary through satirical sketch without making a mockery of their own interests by providing realism in the place of farce.  Do we really give a shit if the show is &quot;a tool of the left?&quot;  We watch because it&#039;s funny.  And, really, doesn&#039;t it stop being funny when it becomes &quot;real?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it does take a lot to make sure the trees all stand in a straight line.  And the grizzly bears need some sort of representation.</p>
<p>I think the point here has been lost on some audience members blinded by all this talk of partisanship.  The real issue is SNL&#8217;s ability to provide timely commentary through satirical sketch without making a mockery of their own interests by providing realism in the place of farce.  Do we really give a shit if the show is &#8220;a tool of the left?&#8221;  We watch because it&#8217;s funny.  And, really, doesn&#8217;t it stop being funny when it becomes &#8220;real?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://korrvalues.com/2008/10/11/sarah-palin-and-snls-cowardice/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://korrvalues.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It genuinely boggles my mind that people unironically trumpet Sarah Palin&#039;s governing the &quot;largest&quot; state.  Are you in elementary school?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It genuinely boggles my mind that people unironically trumpet Sarah Palin&#8217;s governing the &#8220;largest&#8221; state.  Are you in elementary school?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim w.</title>
		<link>http://korrvalues.com/2008/10/11/sarah-palin-and-snls-cowardice/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim w.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://korrvalues.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if palin spoofs an amex commercial, that could be the only thing funnier than fey&#039;s spoofing of palin. i can&#039;t wait to see it. 

it isn&#039;t snl&#039;s job to be a tool of the left. and it isn&#039;t david letterman&#039;s god-given right to have presidential candidates as guests. i would&#039;ve loved to see what letterman&#039;s reaction would&#039;ve been if the exact scenario played out, but with obama cancelling instead of mccain. i suspect all the righteous indignation would have been nonexistent and that letterman would have been happy to do a stupid skit with the deli owner across the street all night. 

idiot partisanship is the biggest roadblock to getting anything we need done done, and i think that palin on snl would be a step -- a very small, perhaps ultimately insignificant step, but a step -- in the right direction. and i suspect i would laugh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if palin spoofs an amex commercial, that could be the only thing funnier than fey&#8217;s spoofing of palin. i can&#8217;t wait to see it. </p>
<p>it isn&#8217;t snl&#8217;s job to be a tool of the left. and it isn&#8217;t david letterman&#8217;s god-given right to have presidential candidates as guests. i would&#8217;ve loved to see what letterman&#8217;s reaction would&#8217;ve been if the exact scenario played out, but with obama cancelling instead of mccain. i suspect all the righteous indignation would have been nonexistent and that letterman would have been happy to do a stupid skit with the deli owner across the street all night. </p>
<p>idiot partisanship is the biggest roadblock to getting anything we need done done, and i think that palin on snl would be a step &#8212; a very small, perhaps ultimately insignificant step, but a step &#8212; in the right direction. and i suspect i would laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommonSense</title>
		<link>http://korrvalues.com/2008/10/11/sarah-palin-and-snls-cowardice/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CommonSense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://korrvalues.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why should Sarah Palin know what the &quot;Bush Doctrine&quot; is?  She was busy running the largest state in the country and making the largest energy pipeline happen.  I want someone with experience that counts not a couple of senators that have done next to nothing except talk big.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should Sarah Palin know what the &#8220;Bush Doctrine&#8221; is?  She was busy running the largest state in the country and making the largest energy pipeline happen.  I want someone with experience that counts not a couple of senators that have done next to nothing except talk big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

